Where You Stand on Julian Assange is Now the Litmus Test

Where you stand on Assange is now a litmus test

Where you stand on Julian Assange is now a litmus test, the likes of which have not been seen since the Iraq War, which in itself was sort of a litmus test, unseen since the Miners’ Strike.

Led by Stella Creasy and Jess Phillips, those who have already failed that test have declared their desire to criminalize male heterosexual activity per se, with no defense to that charge, but with the understanding that there would at least ordinarily be no prosecution unless the female party complained. If they considered any other view, then they would advocate the extradition of Assange to Sweden no more than they would advocate an adulterer or a homosexual be extradited to Brunei.

This particular case has also shed much-needed light on this country’s scandalously one-sided extradition arrangements with the United States. They can get pretty much anyone from the United Kingdom simply by issuing a demand, while we cannot get anyone at all from them. Those arrangements need to be repealed. Two words: Litmus test.

Now, according to what The Mind Unleashed says, more people have been arrested for reporting the war crimes in Iraq than for having committed them. And do you remember when seven years and millions of pounds were spent chasing the people who had crashed the economy? No, neither do I. The permanent American State, rather than the Administration of the day, is still pursuing the Russiagate hoax even after it has been completely blown out of the water. Carole’s Codswallop is also a small subplot, so to speak, within that, and it is also still being pursued. But Hillary Clinton lost. Remain lost. Get over it.

Money buys everything, including fabricated evidence

They have not got over it in the House of Commons. A House comprised mostly of the same people who cheered the war in 2015. And that House cheered this, too. It cheered the fact that Assange was going to be extradited to his death. In the words of the indictment, “Wikileaks solicited submissions” even though Assange did not “possess security clearance”. The cheering of this by MPs and by Lobby “journalists” said everything that needed to be said about both of them.

Yet when the Daily Telegraph published the MPs’ expenses, then it published what it knew to be stolen Government information, information for which, in that knowledge, it had paid. The Guardian acquired its American audience, and found itself garlanded with honors, when it reproduced the revelations of Julian Assange. And so on. The likes of The Guardian, The New York Times, Channel 4 News and the BBC swapped sides only when the line became that Wikileaks had had a part in the defeat of Hillary Clinton.

In that same context, it is not a coincidence that the previously abandoned rape charge in Sweden looks set to be revived. But so what? Even if Assange were a murderer, then he would be highly unlikely to have murdered as many people as George Bush, or Tony Blair, or David Cameron, or John Howard, to name but a few.

There is no evidence against him in Sweden, and what was alleged against him there would not have been illegal almost anywhere else, including here. But what if he were indeed guilty of what would have been, after all, a crime where he did it? Again I ask, would we extradite adulterers or homosexuals to Brunei? And there would still be no way of suggesting, either that bad sexual etiquette was worse than the crimes that he had exposed, or that bad sexual etiquette was worse than the exposure of those crimes.

It is possible to detect a connected failure to appreciate that life is the geological force that shapes the Earth, and that the emergence of human cognition fundamentally transforms the biosphere, not least by the uniquely human phenomenon of economic growth, so that human mastery of nuclear processes is beginning to create resources through the transmutation of elements, enabling us, among other things, to explore space and to exploit the resources of the Solar System. Instead, Mother Gaia reigns supreme, and we are expected to fight wars for Her even while, under Her petticoats, we shiver and starve in the dark.

Another hung Parliament is coming, however, and we need our people to hold the balance of power in it. Litmus test it is.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Experts warn: Macron’s vow to rebuild Notre Dame is unrealistic

Previous article

Sudan: Qatar FM fails to hold talks on Turkish projects

Next article

You may also like

More in Biography